Sensitive records.
Confident release.

AI-assisted redaction across documents, images, audio, and video—with people in control of every release.

RedactStripe case dashboard with pending approvals and redaction tracker
RedactStripe dashboard · Brochure demonstration records
Inside the review

Every layer has a purpose.

Separate detection, reviewer decisions and the release copy so the team can see what is protected—and why.

RECORD EXCERPT DEMONSTRATION

Request reference R-001

Applicant Alex Morgan

Contact alex@example.test

Subject Community services inquiry

Non-sensitive context remains readable.

01 · Detection layerFlag for review
02 · Review layerHuman decision
03 · Release copyProtected content
RELEASE PREVIEW

Applicant · Community services inquiry

Conceptual workflow illustration · Sample content, not a live product screen.
  1. 01

    Intake

    Organize the records for a request.

  2. 02

    Detect

    Identify potentially sensitive content.

  3. 03

    Review

    Confirm each redaction and approval.

  4. 04

    Release

    Produce the authorized copy and audit trail.

Built for records teams

One process. Clear responsibilities.

Find what needs protection

Use AI-assisted detection and OCR to help identify sensitive content. Review the suggested redactions in context.

Keep review accountable

Coordinate FOIA officers, redactors, reviewers, and managers through case stages and approval responsibilities.

Control the final record

Apply permanent redactions and metadata sanitization, with encrypted audit records separate from the released content.

Designed for accountable work

Protection includes
the process.

Role-based access, SSO and MFA support, and a layer manager with locking help teams control who can work on a record and how it is released.

Discuss your media types, security requirements, and review policy during a demonstration.

Illustrative use case · Public records & FOIA

A clearer path from request to release.

A proposed pilot for customer discussion. This is not a completed customer deployment.

The situation

A public-records office receives a mixed set of correspondence and attachments. Staff need to protect sensitive information while preserving the content the public is entitled to receive.

A proposed approach

Use a representative document set to evaluate AI suggestions, reviewer decisions and the final release copy. The records team determines which information should be withheld under its policy.

See your review process in RedactStripe.

Request a demonstration with the product team.

Request a demo